SONARconnects

Thoughts, ideas, comments and viewpoints about the world of Advertising, Marketing and Social Media.

Posts Tagged ‘sonnarconnects’

Accountability In Social Media

Posted by Scott Dunn on March 26, 2009

Be careful what you tweet!  Twitter has been around for the last three years or so and has become all the rage with the Internet 2.0 crowd.  One thing that I caution my clients about when they go onto twitter is this: Make darn sure you UNDERSTAND that anything you write can and will come back to bite you in your ass…so be very, very, very, very careful what you tweet about.  For some strange reason many people think that because a few tweets a day are good, a tweet a minute must be better.  Or because I have a thought right now, I must share it with the world.   Not so says I.  DO NOT tweet, just because you think you need to.

This  Tweet came back to bite the person from Ketchum (New York office) who made some disparaging  remarks about the city of Memphis the morning before he presented on digital media to the worldwide communications group at FedEx (150+) people. A Fed Ex employee found it, was offended by it (as well they should be) and responded as such. But wait, it gets better…they also copied the FedEx Coporate Vice President, Directors and all management of FedEx’s communication department AND the chain of command at Ketchum.

The tweet:

What not to say when your client is FedEx

What not to say when your client is FedEx

The employee response:

Mr. Andrews,

If I interpret your post correctly, these are your comments about Memphis a few hours after arriving in the global headquarters city of one of your key and lucrative clients, and the home of arguably one of the most important entrepreneurs in the history of business, FedEx founder Fred Smith.

Many of my peers and I feel this is inappropriate. We do not know the total millions of dollars FedEx Corporation pays Ketchum annually for the valuable and important work your company does for us around the globe. We are confident however, it is enough to expect a greater level of respect and awareness from someone in your position as a vice president at a major global player in your industry. A hazard of social networking is people will read what you write.

Not knowing exactly what prompted your comments, I will admit the area around our airport is a bit of an eyesore, not without crime, prostitution, commercial decay, and a few potholes. But there is a major political, community, religious, and business effort underway, that includes FedEx, to transform that area. We’re hopeful that over time, our city will have a better “face” to present to visitors.

James, everyone participating in today’s event, including those in the auditorium with you this morning, just received their first paycheck of 2009 containing a 5% pay cut… which we wholeheartedly support because it continued the tradition established by Mr. Smith of doing whatever it takes to protect jobs.

Considering that we just entered the second year of a U.S. recession, and we are experiencing significant business loss due to the global economic downturn, many of my peers and I question the expense of paying Ketchum to produce the video open for today’s event; work that could have been achieved by internal, award-winning professionals with decades of experience in television production.

Additionally Mr. Andrews, with all due respect, to continue the context of your post; true confession: many of my peers and I don’t see much relevance between your presentation this morning and the work we do in Employee Communications.

Wow!!!

Did I say content was king??????  You have the power to the information highway, what you do with it is up to you.  What you tweet about, will be held against you.

By the way, this happened in January.  Not only is it still being discussed at the major social media events (like the one last month at Kennesaw State), but it is also still being written about.  I know I always say there is no such thing as bad press, but I might have to rethink that!

Bottom line:  No mater what you think about the social media space , it is here to stay.  So, learn how to  use it to your advantage and create something good.

Scott T. Dunn

Posted in Social Media | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments »

If Congress Were a Brand It Would Be Discontinued

Posted by Scott Dunn on September 29, 2008

Any good manufacturer would deep-six a brand that has a 17% approval rating.

Any good retailer would show it the door.

Any good consumer would return it and demand a refund.

Unfortunately, congress is a brand that has tenure. We can’t get rid of it.  We can only change its members every two or six years.

The current economic bail-out mess has been described as:

            A failed administration, and a failed congress, 

bailing out failed businesses that have failed the country, 

yet we are assured that it cannot fail!  

Our constitution guarantees legislative continuity, but it is silent about competence.

The market is brutal for brands that fail.  Over ninety percent of new products and new stores are gone after two years. Here are some reasons why brands fail.  One could only wish that our leaders would pay attention:

  • They don’t stand for anything in particular
  • They don’t listen
  • They don’t keep up-to-date
  • They think they are bullet-proof
  • They think they are above the laws (of marketing that is)

I  think that politicians should take Marketing  #101. (They obviously skipped Economics and History.) Good marketers live by these rules:

  • We exist because of our customers and survive at their pleasure
  • We offer a promise and we keep it
  • We aren’t the boss
  • We are trustworthy
  • We are accountable, right now, every day
  We have term limits for our president, for good reason. Why not for congress? Sure, we would give up some experience, but we would gain more from fresh air.    

I tell my students that if they want to succeed in marketing they should first go out and sell something. That is a humbling experience.  They would learn how to fail—graciously. They would have to experience the real world.  Politicians—likewise?

 “Public Service” is a noble calling. But where has it gone wrong?

George Lemmond

 

 

 

Posted in marketing | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Can I afford to advertise in a Recession?

Posted by Scott Dunn on January 29, 2008

I came across an article the other day in the New York Times (it was sent to me by a fellow Town Planner Publisher) which asked a simple question: “Does it pay to advertise during a recessionary period?”  My first thought was why would someone (especially the New York Times) write about advertising in a recession when we are not in one.  A recession is defined as two straight quarters of contraction (I knew my Economics degree was going to come in handy some day).  As of this writing, there has not been one quarter of contraction, much less two.  I guess when you work for the media you actually start believing your own hype!  Never the less, I did find the content of the article very, very, very interesting.  It is nothing new, revolutionary or something that has not been said for hundreds of years.  YES, you MUST ABSOLUTELY ADVERTISE in a recession.  

 I know, I know…I sell advertising, so what else would I say?  No??  While it is true that I sell “Kick Ass  Advertising”, another company actually came up with the findings.  No, that company does NOT sell advertising.  The name of the company is McGraw Hill Research.  They actually use this thing called math to figure it out.

 In a nutshell what they found is this:  After analyzing 600 companies from 1980 through 1985, those who advertised the same or increased their advertising averaged significantly higher sales both during the recession and after it.  My first question was this:  What does significant mean?  According to McGraw Hill, significant means 260% over those who stopped advertising.  If you don’t believe me, see the graph below.

Lastly, the article went on to explain that a company by the name of Meldrum & Fewsmith found that advertising during a recession not only increases sales but increases profits as well.  How can this be you ask?  Simple…it is called Top of Mind Awareness.  When I say car, what do you think of?  How about TV or computer?  That is called Top of Mind Awareness.  If you stop advertising for one second, you risk the chance of losing Top of Mind Awareness.

Still don’t believe me?  I guarantee you that every single one of your answers was influenced by advertising.  How many of you came up with TATA Motors? (Go on and google it.)  Unless you have lived in India, you are not familiar with them.  TATA Motors does not advertise in the USA, so how could you be?

As always, please post your thoughts and comments.  If you would like to see something covered in a blog, shoot me an email or give me a call.

 

Advertising during a Recession! 

Posted in Advertising | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers

%d bloggers like this: